As a kid, my earliest understanding of Count Dracula came
from The Monster Squad (1987), Count Chocula, Sesame Street, and a mythical final boss I could never get to in
the Nintendo game Castlevania 2: Simon’s
Quest. None of which was the proper way to get to know The Count, of course.
And so, I remained ignorant of the real legend of Count Dracula until fairly
recently when I was instilled with a desire to read Bram Stoker’s Dracula (1897),
following a pleasurably short read from Joseph
Sheridan Le Fanu’s Carmilla (1872).
Thanks to Stoker’s novel, I’ve been
on quite the Dracula kick lately, watching a lot of films based on the novel,
such as Nosferatu: A Symphony of Horror
(1922), Dracula (1931), Horror of Dracula (1958), Count Dracula (1970), Nosferatu: The Vampyre (1979), Bram Stoker’s Dracula (1992), and Dracula 3D (2012).
I really think we
would’ve had a near-perfect adaptation with Francis
Ford Coppola’s version from 1992, if it weren’t for the love story between
Dracula and Mina thrown in, and I don’t think Lucy was supposed to seem so
promiscuous, either. I’m actually not offended by a soft Dracula that could
genuinely fall in love with a living woman without wishing her any harm; just
don’t shoehorn it into an adaptation of Stoker’s
novel. A lot of people who haven’t read the book will probably think it was a
romance novel. I actually thought it was an interesting idea in Count Dracula’s Great Love (1974),
where Paul Naschy created and
portrayed, for the first time, Count Dracula as a romantic softie.
Showing posts with label Sir Christopher Lee. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sir Christopher Lee. Show all posts
Monday, November 18, 2013
Saturday, June 23, 2012
The Virgin of Nuremberg (1963)
Thinking outside of the box can be a tricky task, but it is
necessary if one hopes to come up with a story that hasn’t already been thought
of or isn’t something that could just as easily be dreamt up by anybody. The
natural habit of falling into a comfort zone can easily hamper one’s ability to
innovate. In the context of genre film, it is easy to stay inside the comfort zone
while exploring around a little outside of the box, not too far, though, to
discover something pretty new and cool that keeps the genre alive for that much
longer. With Antonio Margheriti’s THE
VIRGIN OF NUREMBERG we have all of the ‘60s Gothic horror themes we know and
love that keep us happy and comfortable but melds and fuses them with
fascinating new approaches that keeps one from getting bored of the same ol’,
same ol’.
A young nobleman moves into his ancestral castle with his wife. After
the wife notices her husband missing one night, she strolls out of bed and seemingly
witnesses the aftermath of a servant being tortured and murdered in the castle’s
museum of medieval torture devices. The person responsible is a ghostly killer
whose identity is hinted at by a servant that refers to him as “The Punisher,”
claiming that he’s come back “to plant the seed of terror in shameless women’s
hearts.” Is the killer her husband, one of the strange servants, or something
else that has culminated from past evils?
A cool little charm to Margheriti’s film is that despite a few
reminders of the modern (1960s Germany) setting, the majority of time spent in
and around an ancient castle frequently fooled me into thinking that this was
an era piece. I liked that there were plenty of candles with antique holders on
hand for when the mandatory thunderstorms would cause the power to go out,
giving us a nice reason to view our gorgeous heroine, Mary (Rossana Podestà of SEVEN GOLDEN MEN), wander
the dark castle halls with lit candles in hand.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

