Riccardo Freda’s last
directorial feature may be flawed, but it is one beautiful looking movie where familiar
and highly significant genre actors such as BLACK SUNDAY’s John Richardson, BLACK EMANUELLE’s Laura Gemser, and giallo favorite Anita Strindberg (her last starring role) come together in a dark
and mysterious series of murders, ceremonies, and somnambulant wanderings in a
secluded villa. With its modern Gothic
setting and indulgently directed sequences, MURDER OBSESSION feels like an
exceptional finale from the man who brought the world the pioneering Italian horror
effort I VAMPIRI and the unsurpassed and hypnotically psychedelic bloodbath in
TRAGIC CEREMONY. The film effectively
establishes the right mood by forcing a throwback to candlelight on account of
the mansion’s electrical wiring malfunctioning, and along with the rich and
vibrant colors as well as the lead character’s hairstyle and mustachio; the
overall feeling is like a ‘60s Gothic in an ‘80s movie. Two of my favorite things…
While playing the role of a killer during the
filming of a movie, the lead character, Michael (Stefano Patrizi), is introduced as a movie star and a shady person
when he takes the method-acting technique a little too far by nearly strangling
his co-star, Beryl (Gemser). Although he might not be the most appealing
or likable, the unease brought on by the character of Michael makes for an
interesting lead that may or may not have a dormant impulse for murder. This creates one of surprisingly few red
herrings in a murder mystery plot with pretty vicious death scenes where
everyone dies except for the killer and one other final character, resulting in
one of those fun horrific endings that is like Oh my god! How could you!? No….
Nooooooooooo!!!! Roll end credits.
An unwavering impulse of nostalgia hits
Michael after a gust of wind forces open his window, interrupting his singing
and guitar playing. As if a spell has
been brought over him, Michael immediately walks over to a desk in the hallway
and opens a resilient drawer that seems to have not been opened in a long time,
revealing photos of his childhood self and his mother, Glenda (Strindberg). The short flashback sequence that results consists of an embrace
between mother and son in a lovely green yard with purple trees bathed in
natural light outside of a huge villa. This scene is done in a way that succeeds in portraying a seductive past,
resulting in a fairly believable motive for Michael’s impulse to return home,
setting up the film’s isolated mansion scenario. After the flashback, the unlikability that I
previously mentioned about Michael further comes out when he calls up his
girlfriend, Deborah (Silvia Dionisio),
and instead of asking her, tells her “listen, pack some clothes, we’re going
on a trip”. What a jerk.
After arriving to the mansion shortly
thereafter, the rest of the film takes place in Michael’s childhood home, where
unresolved issues from long ago are waiting in the dark to catch up to him once
again, and a long forgotten past seems to greet him as if no time has passed at
all. Upon arriving, he is greeted by the
servant, Oliver (Richardson), whom
Michael claims hasn’t changed a bit.
Even his supposedly ailing mother hasn’t seemed to have aged a day since
her appearance in the flashback scene.
One could swear that she appears to be the same age as her son.
Michael’s impulse to return home was so
sudden that even the director, assistant director, and his co-star (Henri Garcin, Martine Brochard, and Gemser,
respectively) of the movie that was previously being filmed eventually tag
along in order to scout for filming
locations. Before the film group
arrives, the time spent with Michael and a few others at the villa seemed
like enough for a compelling story. The
arrival of three additional characters is supposed to be a kind of
more-is-merrier approach to moving the story forward, but it ends up causing
the movie to be pretty messy from here on out.
However, by packing the mansion with colorful characters, a myriad of
multiple directions and outcomes result, such as more murder victims for the
killer and Michael cheating on his girlfriend at the side of the lake with
BLACK EMANUELLE herself (who can blame him?).
Like Deborah says to Michael when the lights go out at the dinner table,
“Why complain? It just adds to the atmosphere”.
The film contains yet another awkward Oedipal theme between mother and
son, with Glenda’s embraces and kisses towards her son feeling a little too
intimate in the wrong way. The fact that
she says “Oh Michael” the same way and is dubbed with the same voice (the
unforgettable and lovely voice of Carolynn
De Fonseca) that dubbed the mother (Evelyn) in the zombie camp-fest BURIAL
GROUND, made this feel extremely familiar to a certain moment with another
Michael in that film.
More several
wonderfully filmed childhood scenes reveal that Michael happens to bear a
striking resemblance to his father, William, a music conductor frequently
referred to as the maestro. Apparently,
when he was only a child, Michael blacked out one night and supposedly killed
his father, further suggesting his latent identity as a killer. A shot of the child version of Michael
holding up a bloody knife happens to be very reminiscent to a particular scene
of another child holding up a bloody knife in Argento’s DEEP RED.
Richardson seems relatively wooden as
the mansion’s expressionless servant/butler, but this works in giving the
character a creepy air and what feels like a mental scarring of questionable
origin.
Along with Gemser, Dionisio is utilized as a visually pleasing accessory to the proceedings but is given more depth than Gemser, which is great because Dionisio is a lovely actress, but being an EMANUELLE fan, I would’ve liked to have seen more of a different side to Gemser than the sexually liberated character she usually plays. She does do some scream-queen stuff, but it would have been nice to see her in a nightmare sequence.
Along with Gemser, Dionisio is utilized as a visually pleasing accessory to the proceedings but is given more depth than Gemser, which is great because Dionisio is a lovely actress, but being an EMANUELLE fan, I would’ve liked to have seen more of a different side to Gemser than the sexually liberated character she usually plays. She does do some scream-queen stuff, but it would have been nice to see her in a nightmare sequence.
Dionisio’s scene where she relates her
nightmare to Michael is too long, as it sort of pulls us out of the story for a
while, but this ends up being forgivable due to Freda’s way of artistically directing and emphasizing all of the
favorable moods and visuals that accompany a dream sequence. It serves very little purpose to the story
other than to plant a clue to the killer’s identity, and it adds more of a discomforting
air to the mansion, as if the place itself has fed Deborah the nightmare. Another great sequence worth mentioning is
the series of creepy occurrences that take place on the first thunder-filled
night that all of the characters spend in the mansion together, which is
essentially a foreboding and taste of things to come.
Although an assistant to Angelo Mattei, MURDER OBSESSION is the first film that the highly
prolific make-up and effects man Sergio
Stivaletti worked on, and the inexperience shows at this point in his
career, as the gore effects aren’t as terrific as the ones seen in other films
produced around the same time, such as THE BEYOND or THE GATES OF HELL. Nonetheless, the murder scenes still offer an
interesting look at one of the SFX greats at the start of his career.
MURDER OBSESSION was the last feature from a filmmaker
that was previously slowing down. This
film feels like a final episode of sorts that is true to form and fits the mold
of the director’s previous horror films, with recurring themes like the bloody
black mass previously used in TRAGIC CEREMONY and the deadly female character in
one of my favorite Barbara Steele
films, THE GHOST. One could easily say
that it is a masterpiece in certain aspects with incredible directing, cinematography,
and atmosphere, but it also lacks the ability to keep the audience engaged
enough to really care where the story ends up going and doesn’t make up for it
with amusing and intense moments like in LISA AND THE DEVIL (at certain times I
found myself wishing that the butler in this film was played by Telly Savalas). With the slight exception of Michael and his
mother, there really weren’t any interesting characters, however, despite its flaws,
I still thought it was an enjoyable viewing experience based on the visually
aesthetic and atmospheric strengths of the film and the theme of a hidden evil
existing in the inner depths of every human soul.
I want to bugger Laura Gemser (as the bird was in 1968 when the bird was 18, not as the bird is now obviously).
ReplyDelete