I’ve been a fan of Alice
in Wonderland since I was a kid, although I didn’t read Lewis Carroll’s Alice books until I was an
adult, which was prompted by my first viewing of Jan Svankmajer’s Alice
(1988), and ever since reading them I’ve been pretty enthusiastic about keeping
an eye out for films inspired by or adapted from the books, which was what
attracted me to the French surrealist film Alice
or the Last Escapade in the first place. I thought the film did a pretty
good job at creating an interesting new take on Alice in Wonderland (without actually being about Alice in Wonderland) while also being a
bit derivative and having an ending that viewers will no doubt have seen before
that I still thought was beautifully executed. It’s also very much of the ‘70s
Eurocult sensibility and a product of its time, but it feels like there’s also a
little something here for everyone, including the curious Alice in wonderland fan (who doesn’t mind a lightly inspired
non-adaptation), and even the surreal, the arthouse, or even the gothic horror
fan.
I’ve only seen a few films from French New Wave filmmaker Claude Chabrol (specifically Alice or the Last Escapade, Le Bonnes Femmes (1960), and This Man Must Die (1969)), but from
what I understand, Alice or the Last
Escapade is supposedly a departure from Chabrol’s
usual style and is a foray into the more aesthetically surreal brand of
storytelling/filmmaking involving a beautiful albeit tragic female muse-like lead
and a co-starring mansion, sort of along the lines of Jess Franco’s A Virgin Among
the Living Dead (1973) and Mario
Bava’s Lisa and the Devil (1973)
but without most of those directors’ particular characteristics.
Being a fan of
so many different genres in movies, music, and video games, I’ve honestly never
been bothered by seemingly endless different takes on the same trope; it’s how
the creators approach it with new interpretations, developments, and personal signatures that help keep the product from seeming too cliché, and despite
the familiarities that are all over the place, Alice or the Last Escapade manages to hardly ever feel too cliché.
Another
major draw here is the appealing presence of Sylvia Kristel in the leading role as Alice Carroll. Viewers do get
to spend the entirety of the film with Kristel
during her escapade into a sometimes startling but mostly relaxing sojourn of isolated
leisure and interspersed encounters with poor conversationalists, who seem to
be trying to be as enigmatic and least helpful as possible. She’s seemingly trapped
in a kind of beautiful green but still nightmarish at times dreamland, with a
mansion at its core that itself is quite generous, laying out food and tea for
her, and even fixing her car, not to mention classical vinyl records and a
plethora of books for her to consume. Her windy, spooky first night at the
mansion suggests that horrors await her, but come morning, she’s all alone in a
sunny, well-tended mansion and there’s bread and butter and tea laid out for
her, and later she’s greeted with raw pork chops that she gets to butter and
cook to her liking.
Understandably, Alice is not happy. After a few futile
attempts to escape the mansion grounds, repeatedly ending up in the same place or following an insurmountable wall and coming full circle, she
seems to reluctantly accept her situation for the time being. The place won’t
let her go (a little like Hill House not letting Eleanor go). Is being trapped
in a reality of leisure and peace, isolated from the real world, really a life
worth living? How long will it last before you’d become permanently detached
from reality?... Here I am, asking questions, a violation of the film’s central
rule, NO QUESTIONS, as several characters who appear out of the blue remind
Alice whenever she questions her startling new situation, kind of like the
first and second rule of Project Mayhem ;).
The pendulum clock in her bedroom
seems to be an indicator of when the hauntings come. Things get tumultuous when
the pendulum starts to swing, and Alice gets the idea one day to try and flee
the mansion when the clock starts up, and whatever it is that’s keeping her
there tries to hold on to her, as space and time distort (an interesting visual
post-editing effect), and Alice is pulling herself against indoor wind along the
floor to get out. She floors her vehicle out the gate in time, eventually
leading up to what I thought was the most memorable and funny part, involving a
bonkers crowd at a homely looking restaurant she stops in (a tea party
counterpart?), where Alice pretty much realizes she’s still a prisoner in
whatever reality has trapped her (like a never-ending trip or dream) before
consigning herself back to the old mansion again.
There might be a little too
much not going on most of the time,
but I really enjoy the surreal nature and ambiance of the entire film, and Sylvia Kristel is an absolute delight;
she really is wonderful for the part, and you do get a sense of concern for
her. I like Alice’s way of rebelling against some of the other characters by staying
hardened and not answering any of their questions either; they seem to admire
her for this.
The film really is a visual masterpiece. Elegant, classical images
are presented in all their brilliant luster, as cinematographer Jean Rabier follows Kristel in varying wardrobe with his camera, exploring the mansion
and its grounds, overgrown with green, inside and out, a strange reality that
seems to be in operation just for her. At one point, Alice strikes a nude pose that
resembles Sandro Botticelli’s The Birth of Venus.
So, what is the
movie trying to say? Or, what does it mean? Of course, it could mean a lot of
things, especially to different viewers, and I enjoy finding meaning in movies
as much as anyone else, but I’m going to sit this one out and choose to play
along with this movie’s game and cease asking questions at this point. A reader
and friend of mine Terence once pointed out to me that there is a
reference to Rene Magritte’s Therapist painting during the part
where Alice talks to the enigmatic boy who carries a bird cage dressed-up like
that resembling the one from the Magritte
painting. The boy likes to liberate birds in his cage one at a time; I like to
think he is freeing souls from captivity. He too does not answer questions. As
another character puts it, “questions are useless… when there are no answers.” There’s
a quote from Magritte that resonates with this film: “when one sees one of my pictures, one
asks oneself this simple question 'What does that mean'? It does not mean
anything, because mystery means nothing either, it is unknowable.” -Rene Magritte
© At the Mansion of
Madness
I get the "idea" of a movie that makes you think, but as viewers that take a couple hours out of our life, a life, mind you for most, that has many questions not answered and souls that make you cry if you think something might have happened to them, well, when the rest of us watch a movie, we want a substantial answer. If a film maker makes their movie cool, but I say make a painting or write a song and save the viewers 2, maybe 10 hours (watching the movie a few times) of torture because we get small doses of this torture every day (almost every day for some) of our lives.
ReplyDeleteAnd lastly, critics and amateur critics like to think they are smarter than most when it comes to this realm of entertainment (t.v., movies, stage). But they are not! John Barrymore was doing Hamlet, I think, and the critics said this was the greatest performance, what a pause and start up, all raves especially at that pause. Barrymore was asked and he said I was drunk and forgot my lines and waited till he received the lines.
P.S. Jack Palance couldn't ride a horse, couldn't trot the horse into town so they said just walk next to the horse and guide it in. Critics said it was the best entrance by a bad guy. Palance said I couldn't ride a horse, no thought that I should walk it in. That's just two, and there are many more where directors and the like get praise, not for creating, but time, budget and necessity called for the scene(s).
Thanks
God Bless!